A while back I posted on the Republican view of morality. It seems Republicans are more apt to support moral views that hold society together and less those that would foster disobedience (including civil disobedience) and an unraveling of societal conventions.
Lawrence Kohlberg, a scholar of both psychology and philosophy, developed a model of the stages of moral development. He interviewed subjects and posed the following question:
In Europe, a woman was near death from a special kind of cancer. There was one drug that the doctors thought might save her. It was a form of radium that a druggist in the same town had recently discovered. The drug was expensive to make, but the druggist was charging ten times what the drug cost him to make. He paid $200 for the radium and charged $2,000 for a small dose of the drug. The sick woman's husband, Heinz, went to everyone he knew to borrow the money, but he could only get together about $ 1,000 which is half of what it cost. He told the druggist that his wife was dying and asked him to sell it cheaper or let him pay later. But the druggist said: "No, I discovered the drug and I'm going to make money from it." So Heinz got desperate and broke into the man's store to steal the drug-for his wife. Should the husband have done that?
The stages are as follows:
1. Obedience and Punishment Orientation.
2. Individualism and Exchange.
3. Good Interpersonal Relationships.
4. Maintaining the Social Order.
5. Social Contract and Individual Rights.
6. Universal Principles.
I so wish I had taken more psychology courses; that might be the very thing I can do now. All I seem to know is some Freudian theory and some Maslow, so I am woefully ignorant in this area.
